• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    A method for recovering cobalt from an oxidised cobalt-containing ore, the method comprising the steps of: Applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent; Washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, producing a cobalt containing solution containing at least 0.01 gL~1 cobalt, and a spent ore; Separating the cobalt containing solution from the spent ore; and Recovering cobalt from the cobalt-containing solution. - 1/1 FeSO4 raffinate from spray SX pant ore conveyor screen pond SX plant
    公开号:AU2013202009A1
    申请号:U2013202009
    申请日:2013-03-26
    公开日:2014-01-16
    发明作者:Garry Mervyn Johnston；Matthew Leslie Sutcliffe；Nicholas James Welham
    申请人:Metaleach Ltd；
    IPC主号:C22B23-00
    专利说明:
    - 1 "Method For Recovering Cobalt from Cobalt-Containing Ores" Field of the Invention [0001] The present invention relates to a method for recovering cobalt from cobalt containing ores. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method for recovering cobalt from oxidised cobalt-containing ores. Background Art [0002] Current practice for oxidised cobalt-containing ores is to reduce the particle size of the as-mined cobalt ore by a combination of crushing and grinding. The ground ore is then added to large leaching tanks containing sulfuric acid. A reductant, most commonly sulfur dioxide, is then added to the tank to reduce insoluble trivalent cobalt to soluble divalent cobalt. [0003] At the Shituru plant, 0.8 tonnes of sodium metabisulfite (SBMS, Na 2
    S
    2 0 5 ) and 1.2 tonnes of copper powder were required per tonne of cobalt produced. These consumption figures make cobalt extraction expensive as these reagents comprised 47% of the operating costs for cobalt production. (M.D.Mwema, M.Mpoyo, and K.Kafumbila, Use of sulfur dioxide as reducing agent in cobalt leaching at Shituru hydrometallurgical plant, Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy volume 102, issue 1, 2002, p. 1-4) [0004] To reduce these costs, gaseous sulfur dioxide has been trialled as a replacement for sodium metabisulfite ('SMBS') and copper powder. Tests were performed at 40*C using ore ground to 80% <74pm. It was found that by sparging SO 2 into the slurry cobalt recovery reached 86% after three hours. However, the sulfur dioxide also reduced iron and manganese within the ore, rendering them soluble in the acidic solution. This increased solubility necessitates further processing to remove these elements from solution giving an increasingly complex, and therefore expensive, flowsheet. [0005] Miller (G.Miller, Design of copper-cobalt hydrometallurgical circuits, Metallurgical Plant Design and Operating Strategies (MetPlant 2008), AusIMM, p.447-460) notes that "[i]n an acid solution the SMBS disassociates to form SO2 (aq) which lowers the Eh in solution and reduces the cobalt oxidation state. SMBS is costly and is only partially utilised with side reactions producing sulfuric acid - particularly in the presence of -2 manganese ions in solution." Additionally, "newer projects are considering the use of liquefied SO 2 " to remove some of the problems surrounding the direct use of S02 in smelter off gas. [0006] The paper by Miller also examines the removal of impurities from the acidic leach solution, notably iron, manganese, calcium and zinc all of which require removal prior to cobalt concentration and recovery. In this paper, it is stated that [0007] "Iron removal has been undertaken for many years in many hydrometallurgical process plants. The classic method is air oxidation to iron (111) and precipitation with lime and or limestone. All the current and previous Zambian and DRC project use this basic method. However the older style plants all suffer from the usual problems of: downstream gypsum precipitation and fouling of process equipment and pipes." Miller also noted that for manganese removal "The process used to date in Zambia and DRC has been a combined iron and manganese precipitation. This has removed the copper and some zinc; but also co-precipitated significant cobalt which has been lost." [0008] The above summary shows that the acid system for leaching of cobalt has considerable problems, most notably the requirement to remove a suite of impurities by a variety of different methods without significant cobalt losses before cobalt can be recovered. [0009] The method of the present invention has as one object thereof to overcome the abovementioned problems associated with the prior art, or to at least provide a useful alternative thereto. [0010] Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the word "comprise", or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising", will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers [0011] The discussion of the background art is included exclusively for the purpose of providing a context for the present invention. It should be appreciated that the discussion is not an acknowledgement or admission that any of the material referred to -3 was common general knowledge in the field relevant to the present invention in Australia or elsewhere before the priority date. Disclosure of the Invention [0012] In accordance with the present invention there is provided a method for recovering cobalt from an oxidised cobalt-containing ore, the method comprising the steps of: Applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5*C and about 65 0 C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent; Washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5 0 C and about 65 0 C, producing a cobalt-containing solution containing at least 0.01 gL 1 cobalt, and a spent ore; Separating the cobalt containing solution from the spent ore; and Recovering cobalt from the cobalt-containing solution. [0013] As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, rendering the oxidised cobalt-containing ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution means effecting one or more of: an improved cobalt recovery, in a shorter time, under milder wash conditions. Milder wash conditions may include, but are not limited to, lower temperatures, lower pressures, or combinations thereof. For example, a given cobalt recovery may be effected in a shorter time, or by using milder leach conditions, or both, as a result of the curing step of the method of the present invention. [0014] The inventors have discovered that the application of a reducing agent to an oxidised cobalt-containing ore under mild conditions is surprisingly effective at solubilising the cobalt contained in the ore, to the extent that economically viable quantities of the cobalt can be recovered by merely washing the ore under similarly mild conditions and for a relatively brief period of time, without the need to use any leaching agents. Avoiding the use of leaching agents and the like has obvious economic benefits in terms of reagent consumption and flow sheet simplicity. Furthermore, the inventors -4 have discovered that the volume of wash solution required to dissolve the solubilised cobalt is surprisingly low, enabling the straightforward generation of cobalt containing solutions of sufficient concentration to be economically recovered by existing means for metal recovery. Furthermore, the inventors have discovered that the reducing agent is effective under mild conditions within a relatively short timeframe. Further still, the inventors have discovered that economically relevant quantities of cobalt are dissolved by the relatively low volume of the wash solution, under the mild temperature and pressure conditions, relatively quickly, providing advantages in terms of process design. [0015] As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, in many applications, it is virtually impossible to completely retain a solution in contact with the ore to be leached. For example, in a heap leaching context, it is virtually impossible to stop some degree of drainage from the ore. The methods of the present invention encompass methods where some incidental separation of the oxidised cobalt-containing ore and the aqueous solution of the cobalt reducing agent occurs. [0016] The present invention encompasses simultaneously extracting one or more target metals other than cobalt. The target metals may be separated by the means for metal recovery, such as by solvent extraction. 1. Oxidised cobalt-containing ores [0017] Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the term "ore" or variations thereof, will be understood to include, for example, the product of one or more pre-treatment steps, such as a roast or calcination steps, or one or more concentration steps, but is not limited thereto. [0018] In one form of the invention, the oxidised cobalt-containing ore contains trivalent cobalt. In one form of the invention, the oxidised cobalt-containing ore contains mixed manganese-cobalt phases. In one form of the invention, the oxidised cobalt-containing ore contains heterogenite (CoOOH) and/or the cobalt/manganese phase known as wad and/or a manganese oxide mineral containing cobalt at <50wt% Co. In one specific form of the invention, the oxidised cobalt-containing ore contains absolane. [0019] In one form of the invention, the oxidised cobalt ore has a cobalt content in excess of any nickel content.
    -5 2. Cobalt reducing agents and aqueous solutions thereof [0020] In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is selected from the group: iron (11) salts, sulfite salts, sulfur dioxide, and combinations thereof. [0021] In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is ferrous sulfate, FeSO 4 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is ferrous chloride, FeCl 2 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is ferrous nitrate, Fe(N0 3
    )
    2 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is an acidic solution of sodium sulfite, Na 2
    SO
    3 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is an acidic solution of potassium sulfite, K 2
    SO
    3 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is an acidic solution of ammonium sulfite, (NH 4
    )
    2
    SO
    3 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is an acidic solution of sodium hydrogen sulfite, NaHSO 3 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is an acidic solution of potassium hydrogen sulfite, KHSO 3 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is an acidic solution of ammonium hydrogen sulfite, NH 4
    HSO
    3 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is an aqueous solution of sulfur dioxide, SO 2 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is sodium metabisulfite, Na 2
    S
    2 0 5 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is potassium metabisulfite, K 2
    S
    2 0 5 . In one form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is ammonium metabisulfite,
    (NH
    4
    )
    2
    S
    2 0 5 . [0022] Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, reference to aqueous solutions of sulfite encompasses sulfite derivatives such as bisulfite and metabisulfite. [0023] The present invention encompasses methods where the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent is generated in situ. [0024] In one form of the invention, the step of: applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5 0 C and about 65 0 C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent; [0025] more specifically comprises: -6 applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore, water or aqueous solution thereby generating an oxidised cobalt-containing ore-water or aqueous solution mixture; contacting the oxidised cobalt-containing ore-water or aqueous solution mixture with a cobalt reducing agent thereby generating an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent; at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5"C and about 65 0 C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent. [0026] In this form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is preferably a solid or a gas. In a highly preferred form of the invention, the cobalt reducing agent is sulphur dioxide. [0027] The aqueous solution applied to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore may be an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent. That is, in a convenient form of the invention, a solid or gaseous cobalt reducing agent may be used to supplement the reducing power of the aqueous solution of the reducing agent. For example, if the aqueous solution of the reducing agent is recovered and recycled, this step may be particularly advantageous. 3. Extent of cobalt recovery [0028] In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5 0 C and about 65 0 C, producing a cobalt-containing solution containing at least 0.01 gL 1 cobalt, and a spent ore more specifically comprises the step of: Washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5*C and about 65 0 C, producing a cobalt-containing solution containing at least 0.01 gLi cobalt, and a spent ore, and in which at least 20% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt-containing ore is dissolved, and a spent ore.
    -7 [0029] In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 25% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 30% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 35% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 40% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 50% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 55% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt containing solution contains at least 60% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 65% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 70% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 75% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised- cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 80% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt containing solution contains at least 85% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 90% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 95% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. [0030] In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains a percentage of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore within a range having a lower value of 20%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 25%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 30%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 35%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 40%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 45%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 50%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 55%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 60%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 65%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 70%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 75%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 80%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 85%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 90%. In one form of the invention, the lower value is 95%.
    -8 [0031] In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains a percentage of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore within a range having an upper value of 100%. In a preferred form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains a percentage of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore within a range having an upper value of 99%. In a preferred form of the invention, the cobalt containing solution contains a percentage of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore within a range having an upper value of 95%. [0032] Throughout this specification, reference to the cobalt initially present in the oxidised ore means a reference to the recoverable cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt ore. Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the phrase "recoverable cobalt" is that fraction of the total cobalt that may be recovered from the ore, of any specific particle size distribution, by using aqua regia (nitro-hydrochloric acid).digestion. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, aqua regia digestion is used to ascertain the head grade of a given ore. 4. Particle size [0033] In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing ore to which the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent is applied is an as-mined ore. [0034] In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing ore to which the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent is applied is a crushed ore. [0035] In another form of the invention, the cobalt-containing ore to which the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent is applied is a ground ore. [0036] As would be recognised by those skilled in the art, the extent of particle size reduction is a function of the dissemination of the cobalt within the ore. Finely disseminated ores may require grinding to expose the cobalt particles to the reducing solution. However, the actual size to which particles of ore are ground is an economic function of cobalt headgrade and recovery. [0037] In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 1 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 2 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 3 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 4 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 6 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 9 mm. In one form of the invention, the -9 80% passing size (P80) is 12 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 15 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 18 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 21 mm. In one form of the invention, the 80% passing size (P80) is 25 mm. 5. Aqueous wash solutions [0038] Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the term aqueouss wash solution" should be understood to refer to aqueous solutions capable of dissolving cobalt (II) phases. [0039] In one form of the invention, the aqueous wash solution is not adapted to reduce cobalt (111) phases. In one form of the invention, the aqueous wash solution does not contain a reducing agent. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, it is virtually impossible to completely exclude reducing agents from an aqueous solution and a preferred form of the invention encompasses concentrations of reducing agent having no practical effect on the oxidation state of the cobalt. In a highly preferred form of the invention the wash solution is water. [0040] In one form of the invention, the aqueous wash solution does not contain a complexing agent. Although cobalt ions do form complexes with water, for the purposes of this specification, and as would be generally understood by a person skilled in the art, water is not considered a complexing agent. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, it is virtually impossible to completely exclude complexing agents from an aqueous solution and a preferred form of the invention encompasses concentrations of complexing agent having no practical effect on the complexation of the cobalt. [0041] In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to <pH6 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to <pH5 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to <pH4 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to <pH3 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to <pH2 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to <pH1 using acid. [0042] In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to pH5-6 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to pH4-5 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a - 10 solution adjusted to pH3-4 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to pH2-3 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to pH1-2 using acid. In a preferred form of the invention the wash solution is a solution adjusted to pHO-1 using acid. 6. Treatment time [0043] In one form of the invention, after the step of; Applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5*C and about 65*C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent [0044] and before the step of: Washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5*C and about 65 0 C, producing a cobalt-containing solution containing at least 0.01 gL' cobalt, and a spent ore;; [0045] the method comprises the step of: resting the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture for less than one week. [0046] In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than ninety six hours. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than forty eight hours. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than twenty four hours. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than sixteen hours. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than eight hours. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than four hours. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture - 11 is rested for less than two hours. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than one hour. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than forty five minutes. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than thirty minutes. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than fifteen minutes. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than ten minutes. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is rested for less than five minutes. 7. Wash time [0047] In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 5 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 10 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 20 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 40 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 60 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 90 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 120 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 180 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 240 minutes. In one form of the invention, the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 360 minutes.
    -12 8. Solids content of the ore-solution mixture [0048] The cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixtures of the of the invention encompass mixtures with extremely high solids contents, such as pastes, and mixtures where solid ore is merely moistened by the addition of aqueous solution of the cobalt reducing agent. In one form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is a paste. In one form of the invention, the cured ore aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture comprises solid ore moistened by the aqueous solution of the cobalt reducing agent. [0049] In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 100 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 200 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 400 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 700 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 1000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 2000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 4000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 7000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 10000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 20000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 40000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 50000 g/L. [0050] In one form of the invention, the solids content of the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture falls within a range of contents having a lower limit of 100 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 200 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 400 -13 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 700 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 1000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 2000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 4000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 7000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 10000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 20000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 40000 g/L. In a preferred form of the invention, the range of contents has a lower limit of 50000 g/L. [0051] In one form of the invention, the solids content of the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture falls within a range of contents having an upper limit of 100000 g/L. In one form of the invention, the solids content of the mixture falls within a range of contents having an upper limit of 50000 g/L. In one form of the invention, the solids content of the mixture falls within a range of contents having an upper limit of 40000 g/L. In one form of the invention, the solids content of the mixture falls within a range of contents having an upper limit of 20000 g/L. [0052] As would be obvious to those skilled in the art, the volume and concentration of the reducing solution will vary according to several factors. The product of concentration and volume is the dose of reductant applied. The specific dose required by an ore can be applied using a low volume of a high concentration or a high volume of low concentration. The volume to be used is a function of the surface area of the ore. A large particle size will require a lower volume than a fine particle size as the surface area is smaller. An ore with a high cobalt headgrade will require more solution and / or higher concentration than an ore with a low cobalt headgrade. 9. Volume of the aqueous wash solution [0053] The volume of the aqueous wash solution should be as small as possible to maximise the concentration of the cobalt in the solution. [0054] In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 50m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 20m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous - 14 wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 1 0m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 5m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 2m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 1 m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 0.5m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 0.2m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 0.1 m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 0.05m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 0.02m 3 /t ore. In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of volume having an upper limit of 0.01 m 3 /t ore. [0055] In one form of the invention, the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range having a lower limit of 0.001 m 3 /t ore. [0056] The wash solution may be recycled several times through the bed of particles in order to build-up the concentration of cobalt before passing it to recovery. This may be performed in a counter-current manner to maximise washing efficiency. 10. Concentration of the cobalt-containing solution [0057] In one form of the invention, cobalt-containing solution contains at least 0.1 gL-1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 0.2 gL-1cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 0.5 gL-1cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 1 gL-icobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 0.2gL-1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 0.5gL-1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 0.7 gL- 1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 1.0gL-1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt containing solution contains at least 2.OgL-1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 5.OgL-1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, - 15 the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 1 OgL-1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 20gL-1 cobalt. In one form of the invention, the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 50gL-1 cobalt. 11. Treating temperature [0058] In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between about 100C and 500C. In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between about 10C and 450C. In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between about 10*C and 400C. In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between about 10C and 350C. In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent ore takes place at a temperature between about 10*C and 300C.
    - 16 [0059] In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 50*C. In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5*C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 45*C. In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 400C. In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 350C. In one form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 300C. [0060] In a highly advantageous form of the invention, the step of applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at ambient temperature.
    - 17 12. Washing temperature [0061] In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between about 10*C and 500C. In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between about 10*C and 450C. In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between about 10*C and 400C. In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between about 10*C and 350C. In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between about 10*C and 300C. [0062] In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 500C. In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 450C. In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 400C. In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 350C. In one form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at a temperature between ambient temperature and 300C. [0063] In a highly advantageous form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at ambient temperature. 13. Treating pressure [0064] In a highly advantageous form of the invention, the step applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 50C and about 650C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent takes place at atmospheric pressure.
    - 18 14. Washing pressure [0065] In a highly advantageous form of the invention, the step of washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture takes place at atmospheric pressure. 15. Cobalt reducing agent dosage [0066] In one form of the invention, the aqueous solution of the cobalt reducing agent contains an amount of cobalt reducing agent corresponding to between 0.2 and 50.0 times the amount of recoverable cobalt present in the oxidised cobalt-containing ore, on a stoichiometric basis. [0067] In one form of the invention, the amount of cobalt reducing agent is between about 0.5 and 20.0 times the amount of recoverable cobalt present in the oxidised cobalt-containing ore, on a stoichiometric basis. [0068] In one form of the invention, the amount of cobalt reducing agent is between about 0.5 and 10.0 times the amount of recoverable cobalt present in the oxidised cobalt-containing ore, on a stoichiometric basis. [0069] In one form of the invention, the amount of cobalt reducing agent is between about 0.5 and 3.0 times the amount of recoverable cobalt present in the oxidised cobalt containing ore, on a stoichiometric basis. [0070] As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, the equation representing the reduction of cobalt (Ill) by iron (II) is as follows Fe2+ + Co 3 + -+ Fe3+ + C02+ [0071] As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, the equation representing the reduction of cobalt (Ill) by sulfite (using sodium sulfite as an example) /sulfur dioxide are as follows:
    SO
    2 + 2Co 3 + + 2H 2 0 -> S04 + 2Co2+ + 4H*; or Na 2
    SO
    3 + 2Co 3 * + H 2 0 -> Na 2
    SO
    4 + 2Co2+ + 2H+. [0072] Accordingly, where the cobalt reducing agent is iron (11), the amount of cobalt reducing agent corresponding to between 0.2 and 50.0 times the amount of recoverable -19 cobalt present in the oxidised cobalt-containing ore, on a stoichiometric basis corresponds to between 0.2 and 50.0 times the amount of recoverable cobalt present in the oxidised cobalt ore on a molar basis. Where the cobalt reducing agent is sulfite/sulfur dioxide, the amount cobalt reducing agent corresponding to between 0.2 and 50.0 times the amount of recoverable cobalt present in the oxidised cobalt containing ore, on a stoichiometric basis corresponds to between 0.4 and 30.0 times the amount of recoverable cobalt present in the oxidised cobalt ore on a molar basis. [0073] Anyone skilled in the art will recognise that the reductant necessary to perform the desired dissolution is not solely determined by the cobalt concentration in the ore and chemical stoichiometry as there may well be other reducible species, such as manganese, present in the ore. Consequently, the actual stoichiometry will be different for each ore and can only be determined by test work. 16. pH and concentration of the aqueous solution of the cobalt-reducing agent [0074] In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is an iron (11) salt, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 0.5 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (II) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 5 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (II) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 10 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (11) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 25 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (1l) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 50 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (II) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (II) sulfate). [0075] In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is an iron (11) salt, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 0.5 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (11) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 5 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (II) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 10 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (11) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 25 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (II) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (II) salt is between about 50 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed - 20 in terms of iron (11) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (11) salt is between about 100 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (11) sulfate). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (11) salt is about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of iron (1l) sulfate). [0076] In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is an iron (Ii) salt, the concentration of the iron (11) salt is between about 0.5 g/L and saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (11) salt is between about 5 g/L and saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (11) salt is between about 10 g/L and saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (11) salt is between about 25 g/L and saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (11) salt is between about 50 g/L and saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the iron (11) salt is between about 100 g/L and saturation. In one form of the invention, the solution is saturated by the iron (11) salt. [0077] In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is an iron (11) salt, the pH of the aqueous solution of the iron (11) salt is between about 1.0 and about 4.5. In one form of the invention, the pH of the solution is between about 1.5 and 4.5. In one form of the invention, the pH of the solution is between about 2.0 and 4.5. In one form of the invention, the pH of the solution is between about 2.5 and 4.5. In one form of the invention, the pH of the solution is between about 3.0 and about 4.5. The latter pH range corresponds to the inherent acidity of iron (11) solutions, across the range of concentrations of utility in the present invention, without the addition of further acid. As will be recognised by a person skilled in the art, the inherent pH of an iron (11) solution will vary with the concentration and identity of the counter ion. [0078] The concentration of the solution of the cobalt-reducing agent that may be used will be affected by the pH. The solubility of iron (1l) ions decreases with increasing pH until it reaches a minimum at around pH 11. However, to maintain a concentration of iron (11) ions suitable for use as a reductant requires a pH below around 7. Iron (11) converts to iron (111) after completing the reduction reaction and iron (1l1) solubility is also affected by pH reaching a minimum solubility at pH 4-9. At a pH below around 3, the iron (Ill) ions formed may be sufficiently soluble to migrate away from the reduction site thereby preventing blocking of the surface through formation of a solid iron (111) phase. The examples presented below do not indicate any blocking of the surface by iron (111) precipitates at pH 3.
    -21 [0079] In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 0.5 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 10 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 50 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 100 g/L and about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is about 100 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). [0080] In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 0.5 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 10 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 25 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 50 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 100 g/L and about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is about 200 g/L (expressed in terms of sodium sulfite). [0081] In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 0.5 g/L and about saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 10 g/L and about saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 100 g/L and about saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 50 g/L and about saturation. In one form of the invention, the concentration of the sulfite salt is between about 100 g/L and about saturation. In one form of the invention, the solution is saturated by the sulfite salt. [0082] For sodium sulfite the main effect of pH is to change the speciation of the sulfite ion, below about pH 4.0 it is present as dissolved S02 sometimes written S02 (aq), above pH 4.0 the predominant species is HSO3. Sulfur dioxide has a limited solubility in - 22 water and this also decreases with pH, so losses of S02 to atmosphere will be greater at lower pH. In the preparation of the pH adjusted sulfite solutions utilised in the examples discussed below the odour of S02 was increasingly strong as the desired starting solution pH was decreased. [0083] In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or SO 2 , the pH is less than 10. In one form of the invention, where the reductant is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is less than 8. In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is less than 6. In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is less than 5. In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is less than 4. In one form of the invention, where the cobalt reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is less than 3. In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is less than 2. In one form of the invention, where the cobalt-reducing agent is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is less than 1. In one form of the invention, where the reductant is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is between about 5 and 6. In one form of the invention, where the reductant is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is between about 4 and 5. In one form of the invention, where the reductant is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is between about 3 and 4. In one form of the invention, where the reductant is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is between about 2 and 3. In one form of the invention, where the reductant is a sulfite salt and/or S02, the pH is between about 1 and 2. [0084] As would be realised by those skilled in the art, utilising a lower pH will increase the consumption of acid and an optimum pH can be determined using economic principles. 17. Means for cobalt recovery [0085] In one form of the invention, the step of recovering cobalt from the cobalt containing solution comprises a solvent extraction step. In a more specific form of the invention, the step of recovering cobalt from the cobalt-containing solution comprises a solvent extraction step, followed by an electrowinning step comprising the formation of a cobalt cathode. In an alternate form of the invention, the step of recovering cobalt from the cobalt-containing solution comprises a solvent extraction step, followed by a precipitation step comprising the formation of an insoluble cobalt salt. In an alternate form of the invention, the step of recovering cobalt from the cobalt-containing solution -23 comprises a precipitation step. In an alternate form of the invention, the step of recovering cobalt from the cobalt-containing solution comprises a crystallisation step. Brief Description of the Drawings [0086] The present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to one embodiment thereof and the accompanying drawings, in which: [0087] Figure 1 is a schematic flow sheet of a method for extracting cobalt from a cobalt-containing ore in accordance with the present invention. Best Mode(s) for Carrying Out the Invention [0088] A heterogenite bearing ore is used as the basis for this disclosure; metal recovery is by solvent extraction and electrowinning. After crushing to a P80 of 3mm, the ore is placed onto a conveyor belt 16 where it is sprayed with 0.1m 3 /t of a solution containing 1 00g/L FeSO 4 10. The sprayed ore remains on the belt for 1 h to enable the majority of the cobalt(III) present in heterogenite to be reduced to cobalt(ll) thereby giving a cured ore. The cured ore is then tipped onto a 0.25mm vibrating screen 18 where it is washed by spraying firstly with wash solution 12 recycled from the PLS pond 20. This can be repeated several times in order to build up the concentration of cobalt in solution before it is sent to the solvent extraction plant. The partly metal-depleted ore is then washed with raffinate recycled from the solvent extraction plant 14. The washed ore is disposed of as tailings. A fraction of the solution in the PLS pond 20 is passed to a solvent extraction plant where the cobalt is selective extracted from the solution which is then recycled to wash the ore 14. The extracted metal is recovered by electrowinning to produce cobalt cathode. [0089] The vibrating screen 18 is intended to retain the majority of the ore whilst allowing the wash solution to pass through without significant loss to the tailings. [0090] The present invention will now be described with reference to a series of examples. The description of the examples should not be understood to be limiting the generality of the preceding description of the invention. Examples EXAMPLE 1 - 24 [0091] 100g of a <4mm particle size cobalt-bearing ore containing 3.45%Co as the minerals heterogenite (CoOOH) and spherocobaltite (CoCO 3 ) was mixed with 40mL of a solution of 1 OOg/L sodium sulphite adjusted to pH 4 using sulphuric acid. The acidified sodium sulphite reduces the insoluble trivalent cobalt present in heterogenite to soluble divalent cobalt. The wet ore was packed into a 25.4mm ID acrylic column and gently compacted. The ore was physically supported by a 0.053mm stainless steel mesh. The packed column was allowed to drain for 24h and a total of 26.5mL was collected. [0092] The column was then irrigated by dripping water onto the top of the column and allowing the solution to percolate through the bed of particles. As the solution dripped out of the column it was collected into separate tubes. The volume of solution and concentration of Co were measured for all samples. [0093] The table below shows the volume and cobalt concentration of the first five solutions collected. A total solution volume of 0.98L was irrigated through the column. All subsequent samples contained <0.1g/L Co. no volume / mL g/L Co notes 1 26.5 1.08 drainage 2 6.5 25.30 3 13 0.39 4 13 0.12 5 13 0.13 [0094] The total cobalt recovery was low at 6.4% because of the high proportion of insoluble spherocobaltite present and the inaccessibility of a proportion of the heterogenite due to the particle size. On the basis of the total recovery the proportion of cobalt leached in the first two solutions was 88%, the solution tenor of cobalt on combining the first two samples was 5.85g/L. EXAMPLE 2 [0095] 100g of the same ore as in Example 1 was mixed with 20mL of a saturated solution of ferrous sulphate and gently tumbled to ensure all particles were wetted. The -25 ferrous sulphate reduces the insoluble trivalent cobalt present in heterogenite to soluble divalent cobalt. The wet ore was packed into a 25.4mm ID acrylic column and gently compacted. The ore was physically supported by a 0.053mm stainless steel mesh. The packed column was allowed to drain for 24h but no drainage was collected. The column was then irrigated by dripping water onto the top of the column and allowing the solution to percolate through the bed of particles. As the solution dripped out of the column it was collected into separate tubes according to time. The volume of solution and concentration of Co were measured for all samples. [0096] The table below shows the volume and cobalt concentration of the first four solutions collected. A total solution volume of 425mL was irrigated through the column. All subsequent samples contained <0.01g/L Co. [0097] The total cobalt recovery was 15.6%, notably higher than in Example 1. This is believed to be mainly due to the greater efficacy of the ferrous sulphate in solubilising the cobalt minerals present. no volume / mL g/L Co 1 13.50 27.35 2 19.75 8.75 3 19.75 0.55 4 19.75 0.01 [0098] The initial two solutions contained 97.6% of the total cobalt recovered at a mean solution tenor of 16.3g/L Co. EXAMPLE 3 [0099] A series of tubes each containing 1 0.Og of a pulverised ore containing 0.64% Co had added to each of them 5mL of a saturated solution of sodium sulphite acidified to pH 2.0 using sulphuric acid. After specific rest times, tubes had 250mL of water added. A tube containing 1 0.Og of ore was also leached without any pretreatment in water. All tubes were shaken for 24h at which time the solution was separated and analysed for cobalt. The graph below shows the extent of cobalt leaching as a function of rest time.
    - 26 The sample where there was no pretreatment is shown at 1 minute on the logarithmic x axis. 100 90 80 70 60 . 50 0 40 30 20 10 1 10 1 00 1000 rest time I min [00100] As is clear, direct leaching resulted in <20% of the cobalt in the ore being dissolved. Resting for as little as five minutes in the acidified sodium sulphite solution resulted in a very significant increase in the extent of cobalt leaching to >80%. Extending the resting time did not provide any further increase in cobalt recovery. EXAMPLE 4 [00101] 50.0g of the same ore as in Example 4 was pretreated by adding 14mL of a saturated solution of sodium sulphite acidified to pH 2.0 using sulphuric acid. After resting for 4h 500mL of water was added. Solution samples were removed periodically and analysed for cobalt. The graph below shows the extent of cobalt leaching as a function of leaching time. 100 90 080 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 time Ih [00102] The vast majority of leaching (84%) is completed within the initial 0.5h (168% / h). Beyond the initial hour, the rate of leaching was very substantially slower at 0.55%Co / h. Clearly, the extra cost of leaching for more than 0.5h needs to be covered - 27 by the increase in value of cobalt obtained by extending the leaching beyond 0.5h. An increase in the leach time to 24h would necessitate a series of leaching vessels 48 times greater in volume than those needed for 0.5h. This represents a significant increase in the capital costs of the plant. The operating expenses would also increase due to the necessity to continue agitating the ore during the increased leaching time. [00103] Without wishing to be bound by theory, the cobalt is believed to be present in two phases, one containing around 80% of the total cobalt which is readily reduced and dissolves in the initial 5 min of leaching, and a second phase with the remaining 20% of the total cobalt which is more resistant to reduction and requires a longer leaching time. EXAMPLE 5 [00104] An ore containing 0.235%Co was treated using acidified sodium sulphite, the resultant paste was rested for increasing time up to 24h at which time it was slurried with water. After 24h of leaching the solution was analysed for Co and the recovery, shown in the graph below, determined. Also shown is the extent of cobalt leaching (7.5%) without any pretreatment. For this ore a longer resting time provides increased cobalt recovery. The extent of cobalt dissolution increased to 52.7% after 0.25h resting and to 61.8% after 0.5h resting. [00105] Clearly, from an economic view the extra cobalt recovered after using a longer resting time needs to cover the capital and operating costs associated with lengthening the resting period. 100 90 80 70 60 40 4 30 20 1001 0 5 10 15 20 25 curing time I h -28 [00106] In this example, extending the rest time to 4h may well be warranted on an economic basis. EXAMPLE 6 [00107] The same ore as in Example 5 was pretreated using acidified sodium sulphite, the resultant paste was rested for 24h at which time it was slurried with water. After increasing leaching time the solution was analysed for Co and the recovery, shown in the graph below, determined. [00108] The leaching was initially extremely rapid with 72.5% Co dissolution occurring in the initial 15mins. Beyond this time the increase in cobalt dissolution was small. 100 90 S60 ~50 40 30 10 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 [each time I h EXAMPLE 7 [00109] Two different ores containing 0.797 (Ore 1) and 0.408% Co (Ore 2) were pretreated using a solution of ferrous sulphate. The resultant pastes were rested for up to 24h at which time sufficient water was added to form a slurry. After 24h leaching the solutions were analysed for Co and the recovery determined. [00110] As with the earlier examples, the recovery of the cobalt is most affected by the occurrence of the pretreatment rather than its duration. The maximum recovery is determined by the mineralogy of the cobalt present.
    -29 EXAMPLE 8 [00111] The same ores as in Example 7 were pretreated for 24h using a solution of ferrous sulphate. The resultant pastes were dispersed with water and leached for up to 24h. After the required leaching time the solutions were analysed for Co and the recovery determined. 100 90 30 70 S60 1 50 40 20 10 0 0 10 20 ;i 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 cur time I h [00112] For Ore 1 the leaching time of 24h gave the highest recovery of 77.5%, 1 h was sufficient to give 57.3%. In this case, the extra recovery is probably sufficient to cover the cost of the extra leaching time. Ore 2 was somewhat different with 1 h giving 46.9%Co, extending the leaching time to 96h resulted in an increase to 55.9%. Thus, the increase from Ore 2 is somewhat less than for Ore 1 and it may not be economically worthwhile leaching Ore 2 for more than the initial hour.
    权利要求:
    Claims (18)
    [1] 1. A method for recovering cobalt from an oxidised cobalt-containing ore, the method comprising the steps of: Applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5 0 C and about 65"C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent; Washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5 0 C and about 65"C, producing a cobalt-containing solution containing at least 0.01 gL-1 cobalt, and a spent ore; Separating the cobalt containing solution from the spent ore; and Recovering cobalt from the cobalt-containing solution.
    [2] 2. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the oxidised cobalt-containing ore contains heterogenite (CoOOH).
    [3] 3. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the oxidised cobalt-containing ore contains mixed manganese-cobalt phases including but not limited to wad and/or asbolane and/or a manganese oxide mineral containing cobalt at <50wt% Co.
    [4] 4. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the cobalt reducing agent is selected from the group: iron (II) salts, sulfite salts, sulfur dioxide, and combinations thereof. -31
    [5] 5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the cobalt reducing agent is any one of the following, or any combination thereof: ferrous sulfate, FeSO 4 ; ferrous chloride, FeCl 2 ; ferrous nitrate, Fe(N0 3 ) 2 ; an acidic solution of sodium sulfite, Na 2 SO 3 ; an acidic solution of potassium sulfite, K 2 S0 3 ; an acidic solution of ammonium sulfite, (NH 4 ) 2 SO 3 ; an acidic solution of sodium hydrogen sulfite, NaHSO 3 ; an acidic solution of potassium hydrogen sulfite, KHSO 3 ; an acidic solution of ammonium hydrogen sulfite, NH 4 HSO 3 ; an aqueous solution of sulfur dioxide, SO 2 ; sodium metabisulfite, Na 2 S20 5 ; potassium metabisulfite, K 2 S 2 0 5 ; ammonium metabisulfite, (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 0 5 .
    [6] 6. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the step of: applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5*C and about 65*C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent; more specifically comprises: applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore, water or aqueous solution thereby generating an oxidised cobalt-containing ore-water or aqueous solution mixture; contacting the oxidised cobalt-containing ore-water or aqueous solution mixture with a solid or gaseous cobalt reducing agent thereby generating an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent; at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5*C and about 65*C, - 32 to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent.
    [7] 7. A method according to claim 6 characterised in that the cobalt reducing agent is sulphur dioxide.
    [8] 8. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the aqueous solution applied to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore is an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent, and wherein a solid or gaseous cobalt reducing agent is used to supplement the reducing power of the aqueous solution of the reducing agent.
    [9] 9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the step of: Washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5*C and about 65*C, producing a cobalt-containing solution containing at least 0.01 gL-1 cobalt, and a spent ore more specifically comprises the step of: - 33 Washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5 0 C and about 65 0 C, producing a cobalt-containing solution containing at least 0.01 gL-1 cobalt, and a spent ore, and in which at least 20% of the cobalt initially present in the oxidised cobalt-containing ore is dissolved, and a spent ore.
    [10] 10.A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the aqueous wash solution is not adapted to reduce cobalt (Ill) phases and does not contain a complexing agent.
    [11] 11.A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the aqueous wash solution is water.
    [12] 12.A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that after the step of; Applying to the oxidised cobalt-containing ore an aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5 0 C and about 65 0 C, to provide a cured ore more amenable to washing with an aqueous wash solution in mixture with the aqueous solution of a cobalt reducing agent and before the step of: Washing the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture with an aqueous wash solution for a period of less than 24 hours at a pressure of between about atmospheric pressure and about 5 atmospheres, at a temperature between about 5 0 C and - 34 about 65 0 C, producing a cobalt-containing solution containing at least 0.01 gLi cobalt, and a spent ore;; the method comprises the step of: resting the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture for less than one week.
    [13] 13.A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the period for which the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture is washed with the aqueous wash solution is less than 360 minutes.
    [14] 14.A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the cured ore-aqueous solution of the reducing agent mixture has a solids content not less than about 100 g/L.
    [15] 15.A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the volume of aqueous wash solution used falls within a range of between of 0.001 m 3 /t ore and 50m 3 /t ore.
    [16] 16.A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the cobalt-containing solution contains at least 0.1 gL-1 cobalt.
    [17] 17.A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the aqueous wash solution is acidic.
    [18] 18.A method according to any one of claims 1 to 16 wherein the aqueous wash solution is alkaline.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    FI123376B|2013-03-15|Extraction of valuable nickel and cobalt fractions from flotation enrichment concentrates from sulfide ore using chloride-based oxidative pressure leaching in sulfuric acid
    CA2683506C|2015-08-11|Process for precious metal recovery from a sulphide ore or concentrate or other feed material
    KR20070060120A|2007-06-12|Production ferro-nickel or nickel matte by a combined hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical process
    KR20070094819A|2007-09-21|Extraction of nickel and cobalt from a resin eluate stream
    CA2659449A1|2008-02-28|Improved hydrometallurgical method for the extraction of nickel from laterite ores
    AU2006236085A1|2007-06-14|Process for extraction of nickel, cobalt, and other base metals from laterite ores by using heap leaching and product containing nickel, cobalt, and other metals from laterite ores
    Niinae et al.1996|Preferential leaching of cobalt, nickel and copper from cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts with ammoniacal solutions using ammonium thiosulfate and ammonium sulfite as reducing agents
    JP2005526909A|2005-09-08|Chloride-assisted metallurgical extraction of metals
    CN109825700A|2019-05-31|A kind of method of valuable metal in low-temperature atmosphere-pressure selective extraction nickel sulfide concentrate
    FI127604B|2018-10-15|Hydrometallurgical treatment process for extraction of metals from concentrates
    Eksteen et al.2020|Leaching and ion exchange based recovery of nickel and cobalt from a low grade, serpentine-rich sulfide ore using an alkaline glycine lixiviant system
    EA019801B1|2014-06-30|Process of recovery of base metals from oxide ores
    US20120186398A1|2012-07-26|Low acid leaching of nickel and cobalt from lean iron-containing nickel ores
    Li et al.2016|Extraction of low-grade silver from a refractory Au-Ag ore in cyanidation by pretreatment with reductive alkaline leaching
    AU2013202009B2|2015-03-19|Method For Recovering Cobalt from Cobalt-Containing Ores
    US8486355B2|2013-07-16|Method for leaching cobalt from oxidised cobalt ores
    WO2016157629A1|2016-10-06|Method for manufacturing nickel and cobalt mixed sulfide and nickel oxide ore hydrometallurgical method
    Harris et al.2006|A new approach to the high concentration chloride leaching of nickel laterites
    Fleming et al.2010|An economic and environmental case for re-processing gold tailings in South Africa
    EP3882366A1|2021-09-22|Solid-liquid-solid hydrometallurgical method for the solubilization of metals from sulfide copper minerals and/or concentrates
    US20090217786A1|2009-09-03|Processing of laterite ore
    Kaya et al.2020|Leaching of Turkish oxidized Pb–Zn flotation tailings by inorganic and organic acids
    Deng et al.2019|Separation of Manganese from Iron in the $$hbox {SO} _ {2} $$ SO 2 Reductive Leaching Iron-Rich Pyrolusite Ore: Leaching Mechanism and Kinetics
    FI56553C|1980-02-11|EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR EXHAUST METALS WITHOUT VAT
    AU2019407237A1|2021-07-08|Process for the recovery of metals from polymetallic nodules
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    WO2014000023A1|2014-01-03|
    AU2013202009B2|2015-03-19|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    WO2007092994A1|2006-02-15|2007-08-23|Andreazza Consulting Pty Ltd|Processing of laterite ore|
    US8486355B2|2009-08-07|2013-07-16|Metaleach Limited|Method for leaching cobalt from oxidised cobalt ores|CN104726701B|2015-03-02|2017-01-11|广东省工业技术研究院|Method for leaching valuable metals in heterogenite|
    CN108570565A|2018-04-18|2018-09-25|华刚矿业股份有限公司|The method of cobalt ore collaborative SCM leaching cobalt|
    法律状态:
    2015-07-16| FGA| Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)|
    2021-04-15| PC| Assignment registered|Owner name: CAPSA METALS PTY LTD Free format text: FORMER OWNER(S): METALEACH LIMITED |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    AU2012902806A|AU2012902806A0||2012-06-29|Method For Recovering Cobalt from Colbalt-Containing Ores|
    AU2012902806||2012-06-29||
    AU2013202009A|AU2013202009B2|2012-06-29|2013-03-26|Method For Recovering Cobalt from Cobalt-Containing Ores|AU2013202009A| AU2013202009B2|2012-06-29|2013-03-26|Method For Recovering Cobalt from Cobalt-Containing Ores|
    PCT/AU2013/000665| WO2014000023A1|2012-06-29|2013-06-20|Method for recovering cobalt from cobalt-containing ores|
    [返回顶部]